On Sunday, February 06, 2011 04:41:44 pm normunds wrote: > I wonder is there a consistent interpretation of mnemosyne gathered > data possible. Has anybody analysed it
Not really, Mnemosyne 2.0 is my priority now. > and what assumptions do you > make and how do you filter of "wrong data" from "regular ones". Or if > not, how do you try to account for presence of some unexpected use > patters. It's an enormous dataset, with many thousands of users. The assumption is that any 'particularities' will be just noise and overshadowed by 'regular' entries. Cheers, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
