>> And (keeping that in mind), I >> don't really know what you mean by unexpected consequences. I thought that >> in Supermemo even as early as SM2 it was possible to modify your target >> rate of memorization
>Not really sure that's a valid argument: Supermemo is extremely bloated and >full of functions which I find confusing for new users :-) There was a reason I didn't stay with it for long! I was going to include a quick jab at SM in that post (something about how it required its own set of memory cards to use it; actually now I think I remember that it literally has that set) but I figured it'd be unnecessary. That said, I was referring to the fact that the algorithm in SM2 (which I think is what Mnemosyne uses, at least as a base) could be modified in this way, but nonetheless I take your point and I'll shut up about it. I look forward to playing around with 2.0, it sounds like a big update. Are we expecting an official release soon? Thanks for your patience ;) Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/UZuQpaLspaEJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
