It may be worth getting together with SM to do a pre-emptive strike on the claim: all or part of it ? George
On 4 Jan 2013, at 23:05, Peter Bienstman wrote: > I'm not too worried, there's plenty of prior art. Besides, they haven't sued > me yet :-) > > Peter > > Quoting Gnome <[email protected]>: > >> Looks like it. Is the patent approved? It can't be right because it's an >> idea that has been around for very long. >> >> On Friday, January 4, 2013 7:27:51 PM UTC+1, gwern branwen wrote: >>> >>> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2012/0322043.html "ADAPTIVELY-SPACED >>> REPETITION LEARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD" >>> >>> > An adaptively-spaced repetition learning system and method facilitate >>> the learning of material over time through the presentation of the material >>> at ever-increasing intervals. Embodiments of the system and method present >>> a stimulus-response pair to a student to obtain a binary response that is >>> either correct or incorrect. The token is next presented to the student >>> based on the student's response. If the response is correct, then the token >>> is presented to the student based on the initial repetition interval >>> without modification. If the response is incorrect, then the learnedness >>> value is reset and the progression through the repetition intervals is >>> restarted. In some embodiments, the initial repetition intervals are >>> dynamically adjusted based on the student's response to obtain revised >>> repetition intervals. This is achieved by manipulating the exponent of the >>> mathematical term representing the curve of the repetition intervals. >>> >>> -- >>> gwern >>> http://www.gwern.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
