On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:40 PM, James Hugman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm happy that we're going to be enabling easy translation of addons from > Chrome to Firefox. Without much to go on, I'd hazard a guess that this is > a) not actual parity with the Chrome APIs, and b) most of what we want from > Chrome is the most well used subset of the API, which is actually fairly > small (e.g. content-scripts). > You can read more about it here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Browser_Extensions > Much of what I am proposing of extensions/extension points is an object in > the existing manifest to cleanup the various barnacles that Chrome's format > has picked up over the years: omnibox, file_*, chrome_*_overrides, storage > attributes are the most obvious examples. > I'm very curious to hear criticisms of Chrome's API. Can you elaborate here? I don't know what most of those things are. -Bill
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
