Finkle also requested uplift on the patches to remove FHR, which will fix two crashes: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183320
Margaret On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Margaret Leibovic <[email protected]> wrote: > We talked about the crash list in our Android triage meeting earlier today. > > Bug 760956 has speculative patches that need to land and be uplifted. > > We also plan to take a look at the long tail of crashes to see if there > are easy wins there. The top crashers that we have right now have been > around for a long time, so they're not easy problems to solve, but there > are likely easy bugs to fix further down the list. > > Margaret > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ritu Kothari <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Lawrence, >> >> AFAIK there are no potential uplifts that are ready to land in Beta44 to >> address Fennec stability issues. Margaret, please correct me if I am wrong. >> >> I know that the team is actively investigating top crashes and provided a >> few fixes up b8. Margaret mentioned a few bugs that are being actively >> looked into: >> >> - bug 760956 (Fix needed from Fennec team) >> - bug 1142944 (Fennec issue so far) >> - bug 854095 (Core::Graphics issue) >> >> We still have a Beta10 (mobile only) planned as usual and I would be >> happy to work with the team to uplift stability fixes if needed. >> >> IIUC, for Fennec 44, we do not think we will get to 100% of end-users. We >> have to continue to investigate Fennec crashes as a high priority so as to >> meet the release criteria for Fx45. >> >> Thanks, >> Ritu >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ritu, >>> >>> We also discussed reviewing additional stability fixes that are suitable >>> for uplift. Can you comment on what we're doing to further improve >>> stability of the release (also a question for Margaret and Brad) and how we >>> plan to get to 100% of our end users? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Lawrence >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Ritu Kothari <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Fennec stability is not meeting the release criteria established for >>>> 44. The agreed upon criteria was a range from 2.5 - 2.8. >>>> >>>> According to the latest crash data, we are at 3.2 and well above the >>>> 2.8 mark. In today's channel meeting, *we made a decision that Fennec >>>> 44 will not be released to 100% of our end-users*. >>>> >>>> *Proposed plan*: On 44 release day i.e. 1/26/16, we will have a staged >>>> rollout on play store. In other words, we will only be releasing Fennec 44 >>>> to a small percentage of our end-users (5-15% TBD). >>>> >>>> *Next steps*: Please follow along the details of the "staged rollout" >>>> in bug 1239022. We will also look into the feasibility of pushing out >>>> security fixes (if such a need arises) in a Fennec staged rollout scenario. >>>> >>>> Please let me know if there any questions/concerns. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ritu >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> release-drivers mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/release-drivers >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
