The fact that you don't see the benefits of the native app over the mobile website is simply an indication that we still have a lot of work to do with the apps, which we are excited to do.
But, is it a waste of effort to bring a truly integrated, seamless Wikipedia experience to our users' mobile devices? I don't think so. Nor is it a waste of effort for the WMF to be seen as a driving force in mobile design and mobile user experience. -Dmitry On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:40 PM, svetlana <svetl...@fastmail.com.au> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, at 00:18, Dan Garry wrote: > > On 16 August 2014 00:29, svetlana <svetl...@fastmail.com.au> wrote: > > > > > We don't need apps. > > > > > > Read this to find out why you're wrong: > > > http://gigaom.com/2014/08/01/wikipedias-new-apps-are-good-for-you-but-theyre-even-better-for-the-developing-world/ > > > > Dan > > Why not use in-browser offline storage? > http://www.html5rocks.com/en/features/storage > > [then you're not missing out people who have neither android nor ios] > > svetlana > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
