Excellent. I'm eager to hear back from them as one element to guide us forward.
--tomasz On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Dmitry Brant <dbr...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Agreed; I think the current production version should be fine for UX review. > > > -Dmitry > > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Dan Garry <dga...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> Unless there are any objections, I will submit our current production >> build for UX review on Wednesday 3rd September 2014. >> >> Once that review is complete, we can take a look at their feedback to see >> how much work is in there, and set a hard deadline. If we finish our work >> before that hard deadline, cool, we can submit forthwith! If not, then we >> submit on the hard deadline irrespective of how done we are. >> >> Dan >> >> >> On 28 August 2014 20:14, Tomasz Finc <tf...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Dan Garry <dga...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> > That works well with what Bernd said about wanting to submit the app >>> > for a >>> > UX review first. We can round off these features while waiting for UX >>> > review >>> > to get back to us, see what we make of the UX review, then submit for >>> > featured. >>> >>> Do we have a date to make this happen? Let's keep the wheels moving. >>> >>> --tomasz >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dan Garry >> Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps >> Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
