I say kill it with fire. I like the feature but it doesn't seem like it is going to get any attention and it is effectively abandoned code. If we needed we can always bring it back without any issues.
I agree with Kaldari, if we do it we should have a Special:Upload minerva page in following sprints. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > I think killing our uploading interface is a probably a good idea > (assuming maintaining it isn't going to be a priority any time soon). > However, I think that if we kill it, we should at least clean up > Special:Upload so that it works OK in Minerva (shouldn't take much work). > This will give 3rd party users a minimal uploading interface if they want > it and also better position us for Minerva on desktop. Once it is working > adequately, we could just have a feature flag to add a link to it from the > hamburger menu (similar to the prior link to Special:Uploads). > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jon Robson <jrob...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> A while back we disabled the mobile uploads interface in mobile. It's >> been sitting in our codebase dormant so people can enable it via user js if >> necessary but it's broken a few times and doesn't seem to be getting the >> attention it needs. >> >> Given there is now an editing team and from what I understand >> UploadWizard is being refactored into oojs ui (which will lead to it being >> less bulky and more mobile friendly) I'd like to suggest we abandon the >> code in MobileFrontend and help support that effort. Note this effort is >> likely to take a long long time, since that extension suffers from much >> technical debt and makes use of jquery ui, which is not available on >> mobile, so to set expectations we're not going to be in a state where we >> can enable this on mobile (if we wanted to which again is highly >> questionable) any time soon (think in units of a year rather than >> weeks/months). >> >> The downside of this is any 3rd parties who are using this uploads code >> (it's turned on by default) will lose this feature and there is no >> available alternative. >> >> I've written a patch to remove it [1] but I just wanted to post this here >> to give people the chance to voice any concerns/disagree with this approach. >> >> Note: We can always restore the code later on if necessary. I argue this >> will be easier than fixing/maintaining the existing code. Someone could >> also put it into a separate extension if they wanted to use it. >> >> See also: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97169 >> [1] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/210084/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mobile-l mailing list >> Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
