When I worked with computer scientists, they never had heard of ethics
reviews. Such reviews are deeply engrained in social scientists and
medical researchers, but I've found a major unawareness among the physical
and computer scientists, except for some HCI folks.

 Barry Wellman
 _______________________________________________________________________

  S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology, FRSC              NetLab Director
  Department of Sociology                        University of Toronto
  725 Spadina Avenue, Room 388                  Toronto Canada M5S 2J4
  http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman            fax:+1-416-978-3963
  Updating history:     http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php
         Elvis wouldn't be singing "Return to Sender" these days
            **** PLEASE NOTE NEW ADDRESS AND FAX NUMBER ****
 _______________________________________________________________________


On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Anthony Townsend wrote:

> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:56:51 -0400
> From: Anthony Townsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mobile-society] Re: Cell phone users secretly tracked in study
>     - CNN.com
>
> The ethics debate over the apparent total lack of human subjects
> review for this project is pretty fascinating.
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Chih-Hui Lai wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I checked on Barabási's lab website and located the original
> > article. The link is as follows.
> >
> > http://www.barabasilab.com/pubs/CCNR-ALB_Publications/200806-05_Nature-MobilityPatterns/200806-05_Nature-MobilityPatterns.pdf
> >
> > best,
> >
> > Chih-Hui
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Frank Thomas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The article has been published in Nature González, M. C. , Hidalgo, C.
> > A. & Barabási, A.-L.
> >
> >
> >      Mobile phones demystify commuter rat race
> >      <http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080604/full/news.2008.874.html>
> >
> > Nature 453, 779–782 (2008).
> >
> > Has anyone here access to the article ?
> >
> >
> > > Researchers have come up with a new use for the ubiquitous mobile
> > > phone: tracking human movements. By monitoring the signals from
> > > 100,000 mobile-phone users sending and receiving calls and text
> > > messages, a team from Northeastern University in Boston,
> > > Massachusetts, has worked out some apparently universal laws of
> > human
> > > motion.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The distances people covered varied widely between individuals, but
> > > follow a similar pattern — most people move on average a short
> > > distance on a daily basis, whereas a few hardy souls move long
> > > distances in a short time.
> >
> > The researchers found a distance decay in movement patterns. Surprise.
> >
> > On the individual level, what about Frederick Stutz. 1973. Distance
> > and
> > Network Effects on Urban Social Travel Fields. Economic Geographic 49,
> > 134-144.
> >
> > On the aggregate level, in planning telephone networks and tariff
> > structures the distance decay of call patterns is used since the end
> > of
> > the 19th century.
> >
> > A real treat would have been to compare the distance gradients for
> > different groups, or technologies.
> >
> > - F. Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have not found the original paper in Nature, but it seems that the
> > >  study has also riven rise to some questions about tracking via use
> > > of the mobile phone.
> > >
> > > Rich L.
> > >
> > > http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/04/cell.tracking.ap/index.html
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > >
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mobile-society" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mobile-society?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to