you are right sir this was the best axplaination i have ever read on
any mailing list.
Black berry can be proved the best option if its accessible.

On 4/19/13, mujeeb rahman. <mujeeb.vakka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Friend,
>
> This was one of the most important mails which I have ever read
> regarding accesibility. Though some of the list members tried to solve
> the issues, none of them gave such a nice explanation! Eventhough you
> said it precisely, as others, I too request you to be specific in
> suggesting a wonderful model which can be updated in the future.
>
> Thanks for your time and look forward for your positive response.
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Mujeeb Rahman
>
> On 4/19/13, S R Mittal <srmit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mobile.accessindia
>> [mailto:mobile.accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of
>> prateek
>> aggarwal
>> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 6:01 PM
>> To: mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>> Subject: [Mobile.AI] which phone should you buy?
>>
>> Folks:
>> during my stay on this list from last few days, I've been able to
>> observe that there are quite a lot of confusions in regards to which
>> phone one should buy, and specially the accessibility of android based
>> phones.
>> Being a user of a number of phones right from symbian second edition
>> to the smartphone breeds, I thought to answer the questions based on
>> my personal observations and experiences if they can help someone in
>> some ways.
>> Like vamshi bro pointed out, choosing a suitable phone has really
>> become million dollar question these days keeping in mind:
>> I phone(costly), Nokia (outdated), Android(confusing)  etc.
>> iPhone, particularly is indeed very accessible, but its far too costly
>> than most users shall appreciate to buy. Hence,  I'd like to
>> specifically focus on whether one should buy nokia or android, and
>> what specific things one should keep in mind in order to choose an
>> android phone.
>>
>> well, the answer to that question is indeed difficult, and  actually
>> quite subjective to the choice and circumstances of every
>> individual.
>> say, for instance, those who do not have much time/interest  to
>> explore and just require  a solution that's  tried and tested,
>> some phones of nokia are still available in the stock  unofficially,
>> that they can buy and start using right away.
>> it, however is the reality that symbian is no more available and
>> no further such phones are being manufactured by the company
>> anymore. therefore, android is the best option keeping the
>> availability, cost and accessibility in mind. about android
>> version, both 4.0 and 4.1 are accessible, none of them is 100%
>> accessible though.
>> well you have to accept the fact that android is comparitively new
>> and while i personally appreciate google's efforts of implementing
>> out of the box accessibility features, it'll obviously take time  to
>> jell with the expectations of the visually challenged  individuals who
>> as well have diverse needs/requirements depending  on their
>> environments and demographics.
>>
>> so, if you choose to buy the android phone, keep the following  things in
>> mind:
>>
>> .whatever someone might claim, no android phone is 100 percent
>> accessible as of now, though the statement depends on what tasks  you
>> would like to perform with your phone, as a lot of them shall  be
>> accessible and a lot of them won't be.
>>
>> .android requires the user to have quite a learning curve and the
>> patience as one might need to install, try and test with a number  of
>> third party apps in order to get some tasks done. so if you are  not
>> interested/motivated for the same, reconsider your decision.
>>
>> .most of the android based phones that you'll find in the market are
>> touchscreen based.   while  the android certainly has  accessibility
>> features to enable users to use touch screen with
>> screenreaders/magnification applications,   i can tell you out of my
>> personal experiences that the best speed and comfort that you can find
>> is to have the phone that has both touch and type available, although
>> i'm fortunate to be able to use 100 percent touchscreen phones as well
>> with quite a reasonable speed.
>>
>> .the tasks like messaging, contacts, phone, music, camera etc are over
>> 90 percent accessible in my experience.
>> .Log is slightly inaccessible in comparision to nokia phone, but still
>> manageable.
>> .GPS works fairly good, and the support of google maps is excellent.
>> .fm radio is slightly inaccessible,  internet radios are manageable
>> with the help of third party apps.
>> .There are apps available for emailing, facebook, twitter, skype, call
>> recording, dictionary, daisy book reading and other such basic tasks,
>> which are reasonaablly accessible.
>> .reading word, excel and pdf document is not much accessible as yet.
>> .there are apps for colour identification, face recognition, OCR etc
>> which though are not perfectly developed as yet, but certainly looks
>> promising.
>>
>> .the versions of android shall keep improving, and they really have
>> to. however, the accessibility available in android 4.0 and 4.1 is
>> quite reasonable, and either of them can be chosen with no hezitations
>> as such. even the 4.0, for instance provides you quite a number of
>> options to use the phone accessiblly, and 4.1. only adds the icing on
>> the cake. personally, i did not find much of a difference in 4.1 and
>> 4.2 though.
>>
>> .considering the fact that android does have the in-built
>> accessibility  options available, most of the phones that you buy from
>> the market should be usable without much of a configguration. though,
>> i personally found out that some phones of HTC and LG were using a
>> broken accessibility architecture, and did have issues that are not
>> found in many of the companion phones.
>>
>> .rs. 10 to 12  thousand is quite a reasonable amount to obtain a good
>> android phone. fortunately, you've got plenty of options and brands
>> available to choose from, and i don't see a reason why you shouldn't
>> be able to get a good phone with reasonable features in this amount.
>>
>> in a nutshell, the decision to buy or not buy android is completely
>> subjective depending on the above points, and if you've got the
>> courage, learning curve, need and excitement of using an android based
>> phone, go for one, and you'll definetly enjoy it.
>> technologies are changing fast, and android is the most latest option
>> for any mobile buyers including visually impaired  individuals if they
>> have to step with the changing trends. particularly about visually
>> impaired persons, i personally advise to go for it if you can, as the
>> feedback from most possible users can only make the good things
>> happened, and only then we, as a group of visually impaired
>> individuals shall be able to turn the stones in our favor by getting
>> more features implemented both by google as well as the third parties.
>>
>> I don't know if the above lengthy email has helped anyone of you, but
>> if it has helped in any little way, please feel free  to write back
>> for anymore questions/queries/doubt that you may have, where  you feel
>> that I can help you with.
>> Please understand that above points are based only on my personal
>> observations and experiences which are of course limited  and they may
>> or may not be true in your context.
>> Thank you for reading my such a lengthy email, and I'll be happy to
>> learn from your experiences as well. Please write back with your
>> experiences especially if they add or correct something to my
>> observations written above.
>> Regards,
>> Prateek agarwal.
>> CEO,
>> Daedal technovations pvt. Ltd.
>> www.daedaltechnovations.com
>>
>> Search for previous postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mobile.accessindia mailing list
>> Mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessind
>> ia.org.in
>>
>> to post send mail to: mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> Search for previous postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mobile.accessindia mailing list
>> Mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>> to post send mail to: mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>>
>
> Search for previous postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobile.accessindia mailing list
> Mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
> to post send mail to: mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
>

Search for previous postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in



_______________________________________________
Mobile.accessindia mailing list
Mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in

to post send mail to: mobile.accessindia@accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to