We definitely won't be extending itemgetter to do two entirely different things based upon the argument passed. However, we could create a differently named function (e.g. "rowgetter" or something of that sort) that does that.
-bob On 2/7/07, Johnny Blonde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One more thing, > > is it now planned to extend itemgetter in order to accept an array > with the returning-order needed as mentioned by Arnar in its previous > post? > > Regards, Frank > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
