On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > > I made the flow control setting a readable property in the Modem >> > > object, and a RW property in the Bearer object. The property is >> > > inherited by the bearer object when it is created, i.e. in >> > > mm_broadband_bearer_new() we just read the property from the >> > > modem >> > > and we set it in the bearer creation. >> > > >> > > I thought of g_object_bind_property()-ing them whenever the >> > > "modem" >> > > object was set as property in the "bearer" object, but then >> > > realized >> > > that happens in "MMBaseBearer" level not in "MMBroadbandBearer", >> > > so >> > > decided not to complicate it more; especially since the property >> > > won't change any more. >> > > >> > > What do you think? >> > >> > Looks OK to me, though if we're not exposing the flow control via >> > the >> > D-Bus API on the Modem object, should we just not bother making it >> > a >> > property there? It's not used anywhere yet... >> >> After moving the flow control setting to the bearer creation method I >> needed a way to receive the actual setting value; and definitely >> didn't want to modify the mm_broadband_bearer_new() parameters with a >> new MMFlowControl one (as that method is used in lots of plugins as >> well). So, at the end I did need a way to get information from the >> modem object from within the bearer object, so instead of having a >> mm_broadband_modem_get_connected_flow_control() method as in the >> first >> patch, I ended up with the read-only property... too convoluted >> maybe? > > mm_broadband_bearer_new() is only used in 9 places though (including > the 2 hits in mm-broadband-bearer.c/h itself). Not too many for me to > say we shouldn't bother changing it?
Well, the thing is that we would then have 9 places calling mm_broadband_modem_get_connected_flow_control() instead of one (as the modem subclasses in the plugin don't have direct access to self->priv->flow_control in the MMBroadbandModem... don't know, I'm not very convinced with any of the solutions, truth be told. -- Aleksander https://aleksander.es _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel