> > I've been a bit nervous about the weight of the GTask migration changes > but, to be fair, I don't think I've encountered any issues with them.
We've been running off '689dad9f6e4a08c5f68a02363703d58f6d9fbadf' which had all the GTask items, for the Cinterion plugin, and it's been very stable for us. Thanks Ben for that! We've had at least 3 weeks on our CI testing connections and mem-leaks as well as field testing without any stability issues. I wouldn't mind having a proper tag, but certainly wouldn't rush a release over it. Just my 2 cents. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Aleksander Morgado < aleksan...@aleksander.es> wrote: > > I've been a bit nervous about the weight of the GTask migration changes > but, to be fair, I don't think I've encountered any issues with them. > > Yeah, agree. There are still some key things to migrate, but the idea > would anyway be to have a release candidate version tagged for a while > and poke distributions about it, and make sure we test with all our > modems before tagging a final release. > > -- > Aleksander > https://aleksander.es > _______________________________________________ > ModemManager-devel mailing list > ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel >
_______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
