Hi, Le 09/05/2013 16:49, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : > Hi *, > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Sophie Gautier <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 09/05/2013 15:52, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: >>> Isnt that the same thing as emailing back saying reject? >> >> yes, it's said on the mail that passed a 10 (?) days delay, the mail >> will be automagically destroyed :) > > The effect for the list-subscribers is the same (they don't get the > mail) - the difference is that when you explicitly reject a message, > other moderators cannot moderate the message anymore, as it is removed > from the moderation-queue on the server. > > So it is only necessary if your want to prevent that other moderators > approve the message - be it because it contains some private data or > because a mail looks legitimate, but you know it is > spam/troll/phishing.
What happens when a moderator rejects a mail? Is there a mail sent to the sender? In that case the side effect of the rejection is to inform the spammer that the email is valid, so he can send another spam. Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
