Am I the only victim of someone at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? or do anyone else
receives zillions replicated emails?
Accoring to the headers this time it doesn't come from apache.org but
from amazon.com!!!
As of this moment I've got about 800 emails most of them are the same...
I've contacted [EMAIL PROTECTED] but in vain!
Here is one of them:
>From MAILER-DAEMON Sat Oct 02 14:36 IST 1999
Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by
iil.intel.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA60246 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 2
Oct 1999 14:36:02 +0200
Received: from smtp-outgoing.amazon.com (mail-out-6.amazon.com [209.191.164.156])
by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56
iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id MAA29568
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 12:35:06 GMT
Received: by smtp-outgoing.amazon.com (Postfix) via BOUNCE
id 804A31B62; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 05:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="F3DA71E95.938867281/smtp-outgoing.amazon.com"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: RO
X-Status:
This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
--F3DA71E95.938867281/smtp-outgoing.amazon.com
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain
This is the Postfix program at host smtp-outgoing.amazon.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix program
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host Mail.alameda.net[207.90.181.2] said: 550 Temporary
block
--F3DA71E95.938867281/smtp-outgoing.amazon.com
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from mail-proxy-2.amazon.com (mail-proxy-2.amazon.com [10.16.42.166])
by smtp-outgoing.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DA71E95
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-proxy-2.amazon.com id TAA09853; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RD: Re: Modperl vs C ...
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 20:55:59 +0200 (IST)
Received: from mail-relay-2.amazon.com by mail-delivery-3.amazon.com with ESMTP
(crosscheck: mail-relay.amazon.com [10.16.6.74]) id LAA26742; Sat, 25 Sep 1999
11:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-relay-2.amazon.com id LAA18485; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [207.90.187.149] by service-4-internal.amazon.com via smtpd (for
mail-relay.amazon.com [10.16.6.74]) with SMTP; 25 Sep 1999 18:55:34 UT
Received: from hyperreal.org (taz.hyperreal.org [209.133.83.16]) by
hermes.accept.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA20215 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 11:51:07 -0700
Received: (qmail 295 invoked by uid 6000); 25 Sep 1999 18:55:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 283 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1999 18:55:26 -0000
Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (143.182.246.25) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 25
Sep 1999 18:55:26 -0000
Received: from iil.intel.com (iil.intel.com [143.185.96.126]) by melete.ch.intel.com
(8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id
SAA25599; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 18:54:50 GMT
Received: from ilx374.iil.intel.com (ilx374.iil.intel.com [143.185.192.35]) by
iil.intel.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id UAA24144; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 20:55:31 +0200
Received: from localhost by ilx374.iil.intel.com (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/IDC-RS6000-AIX-3.2)
id AA21798; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 20:55:59 +0200
Cc: mod_perl list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
According to Viren Jain:
> What kind of memory requirements are needed for serving such loads with
> mod_perl. My concern (I am also building a large web app with mod_perl) is
> that each mod_perl apache process uses between 5 and 10 megabytes of memory
> (or more), so to sustain 100 hits per second massive amounts of RAM would
> be required. Is this true?
Please don't start this huge thread again, it's has been talked about so
many times. Folks and I have documented most of the important things. Take
a look at http://perl.apache.org/guide and other faqs at
http://perl.apache.org
Take your time to read them and especially the performance section of the
guide.
If after reading you still have any questions, please feel free to ask.
Thank you for saving our time for creating new things and not playing the
old record again and again.
BTW, you better wait for a few hours, I'm going to release a new version
of the guide.
_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.singlesheaven.com/stas
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC at www.singlesheaven.com/stas/TULARC
www.apache.org & www.perl.com == www.modperl.com || perl.apache.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven http://www.singlesheaven.com
--F3DA71E95.938867281/smtp-outgoing.amazon.com--
_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.singlesheaven.com/stas
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC at www.singlesheaven.com/stas/TULARC
www.apache.org & www.perl.com == www.modperl.com || perl.apache.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven http://www.singlesheaven.com
