Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm :-(
>
> On 14 Jan 2000, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
>
> >
> > Without having checked your list, I'll wager that the "good" modules
> > are all pure perl and the "bad" ones use machine-language XS
> > extensions.
>
> So typical modules like MD5 and MIME::Body are "bad" modules?
There is nothing wrong with the modules, that's why I put "bad" in
inverted commas. They are only "bad" in the sense that they trigger a
bug in dynamically-linked mod_perl.
--
Frank Cringle, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice: (+49 2304) 467101; fax: 943357