On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> [snapshots]
> > It's much easier than starting with a real CVS server if you do that for
> > the first time. But it worth the hassle, if you want to use open source
> > software and live on the cutting edge.
>
> but with the "real cvs" it's much easier to keep updated, put your own
> patches and test thingies into the source tree, make diffs to see what
> changed when something on your testserver stops working and so on.
Ask, you have misread my statement. I said when you do that for the first
time (meaning, when you need your server to work yesterday and the current
CVS version fixes the problem.
Trying to discourage using CVS is the last thing I'd think about. I think
I do more cvs commands per day than any other :)
> If you don't want all that, you probably don't want the unreleased
> version in the first place. (assuming Doug will start releasing a little
> more often now :-) )
______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman | JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ | mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://perl.org http://stason.org/TULARC/
http://singlesheaven.com| http://perlmonth.com http://sourcegarden.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
