On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Greg Cope wrote: > Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to > set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z > apache (say 60 to handle static + dynamic content - assuming the dynamic > content is passed to the Perl interpreters) children, and hence have > significant memory savings as we can avoid (in some cases) the light / heavy > httpd model ? yes, exactly.
- mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Doug MacEachern
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Matt Sergeant
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Doug MacEachern
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Matt Sergeant
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Doug MacEachern
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Greg Cope
- RE: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Gerald Richter
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev [ - possibly OT ] Greg Cope
- RE: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev [ - possibly OT ... Gerald Richter
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev [ - possibl... Greg Cope
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Doug MacEachern
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Stas Bekman
- Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Doug MacEachern
- Re: Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Greg Cope
- Re: Re: mod_perl-1.99_01-dev Doug MacEachern