Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques

[Perrin Harkins]

On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> And the results are:
> 
>   single_print:  1 wallclock secs ( 1.74 usr +  0.05 sys =  1.79 CPU)
>   here_print:    3 wallclock secs ( 1.79 usr +  0.07 sys =  1.86 CPU)
>   list_print:    7 wallclock secs ( 6.57 usr +  0.01 sys =  6.58 CPU)
>   multi_print:  10 wallclock secs (10.72 usr +  0.03 sys = 10.75 CPU)

Never mind the performance, that multi_print and list_print are just
U-G-L-Y!  Here doc rules.  Great for SQL too.
- Perrin