Obviously not the same stuff as you ;-)

You missed my point, even though you reiterated it in your statement...

How can you make a valid comparison between mod_perl against PHP?  You
can't because they are different beasts and serve different purposes. 
That's why I said it would be more valid to compare JSP against mod_perl
- similar technologies.

Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> 
> With all due respect, what the hell are you smoking?
> PHP is an ENTIRELY different beast from perl, or mod_perl.
> 
> http://php.net has absolutely nothing to do with Larry Wall
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erich L. Markert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 12:41 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: mod_eprl or PHP
> >
> >
> > This is also comparing apples and oranges since PHP requires
> > mod_perl...
> >
> > A better comparison would be HTMLEmbperl vs. PHP
> >
> > Or mod_perl vs. java server pages, ASP, etc...
> >

--
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Erich L. Markert                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Learning Center                 TEL (914)422-4328
Pace University
1 Martine Ave
White Plains, New York 10606-1932

Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
                -- Henry Spencer

Reply via email to