Todd Finney wrote:
> The one-sentence version of my question is: Is there a
> problem with tying a session twice during two different
> HeaderParserHandlers, as long as your doing the standard
> cleanup stuff (untie &| make_modified) in each?
It seems like the answer should be no unless there's some kind of bug,
but I don't understand why you're doing it this way. Why don't you just
put a reference to the %session hash in pnotes and use it in the second
handler, instead of putting the ID in and re-creating it? That should
be considerably more efficient.
- Perrin
