On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> mod_perl 2.0
>
> At 10:33 PM 2/28/2001 -1000, Kee Hinckley wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >At 9:44 AM +0800 3/1/01, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > >At this moment anybody who has an access to mod_perl server can read any
> > >data which is accessible by the same server. suexec is not an option
> > >because of process persistance.
> >
> >I suspect this is why it is very easy to find hosting providers who
> >provide PHP, and not as easy to find providers who support Embperl,
> >Mason or other mod_perl solutions. Is there any effort to deal with
> >this? (Per-virtual-server-process-sharing, with the option of
> >dropping to zero processes, seems like a good start.) I'd really
> >like to see languages like Embperl stand a better chance going
> >head-to-head against PHP. It's very annoying to be able to whip
> >together a great solution for my own servers, only to have to
> >implement it for one of my clients in PHP, without nearly the power
> >that Perl gives me.
See http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/modperl_2.0.html
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://logilune.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
