> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Landrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:19 AM
> To: Geoffrey Young; 'Mike Cameron'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: push_handlers question
>
>
> At 10:36 AM -0500 3/5/01, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is
> >> > why is the
> >> > request object passed if I call the module directly from
> >> > http.conf and not
> >> > when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not
> >> > functionally
> >> > equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in
> >> > httpd.conf.
> >>
> >> according to the mod_perl pocket reference (p20) method
> >> handlers do not get
> >> the request object passed to them
> >
> >I should have said method handlers that are set up via
> push_handlers() don't
> >have the request object passed to them.
> >
> >for normal method handlers,
> >$self = shift;
> >$r = shift;
>
>
>
> Couldn't you fake it?
>
> $r->push_handlers(
> PerlHandler => sub{ unshift @_, Apache->request; goto
> &real_handler; }
> );
there's always more than one way :)
--Geoff
>
> Robert Landrum
>
>
> >[snip]
> >
> >
>
> --
> "Will hack Perl for food."
>
