At 07:44 AM 7/5/2001 +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On 04 Jul 2001 17:31:24 +0200, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > The question is: Are a few good developers all we need? If this is the
> case
> > we can safely ignore to be ignored (we have them).
> >
> > It is OK to be one of the few people to know the leading Apache
> development
> > system. But it has serious drawbacks. Where I work people are migrating
> > from server side javascript to java. With better Perl marketing they might
> > migrate from Perl/CGI to mod_perl and my work would be more fun (I do
> > consider changing my
> > job an option, but I like the people I work with). It is however
> > frustrating to leave work, get on the tram, take out my laptop and do it
> > better than I did the 8h before.
> >
> > So do we want to be "Enterprise" and "Industry Standard" and such crap?
>
>
>Yes, we do. But I don't think it's enough to convince people to move to
>"mod_perl". They want to move to a better framework. I'm sure you know
>which one I favour :-) Sadly most people *still* see Perl on the web as
>CGI, as printing out your HTML from code, etc. It needs more articles in
>the right places to fix that sort of misconception.
>
>Matt.
This is really off topic.
Anyway, so what are the right places for those articles? Microsoft Systems
Journal? :)
And what should we do to get the articles in the right places?
__________________________________________________
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
