Philip Mak wrote:
>
> One thing caught my eye; how come "mod_perl handler" (808.4 hits per
> second) performed better than "HTML static" (768.2 hits per second)?
>
Here are my comments on this from the original post:
HTML static
for the first time, looks slower on my system than mod_perl.
It may be that the default 1.3.20 apache install/config does
more work on the headers. Also this is a dual proc system
which has slowed down the HTML static test before, relative
to single CPU systems.
> And sorry for my newbie-ish question, but what is the difference
> between "mod_perl handler" and "Apache::Registry mod_perl"?
Check out the full code in the benchmarks at:
http://www.chamas.com/bench/hello.tar.gz
For the hello tests, one is an Apache::Registry run
CGI script, and the other a small mod_perl module handler
written for the hello bench. For the 2000 benchmark,
the Registry mod_perl is a .pl script, but uses the
modperl API for things like headers.
-- Josh
_________________________________________________________________
Joshua Chamas Chamas Enterprises Inc.
NodeWorks Founder Huntington Beach, CA USA
http://www.nodeworks.com 1-714-625-4051
