On Sunday 25 November 2001 22:37, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
Simple, nice, and cool (imho), thanks for submitting !
> * The first page ("Home") successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you see any
reason why they wouldn't ?) ?
> * While the design might not be to cool from the designers point of view, I
> like it because it is simple, doesn't use HTML-tables, is small and fast
> (/very/ little HTML-overhead) and accessible to disabled people.
That's imho fine. Until someone decides to become a marketing geek and
creates content for PHB-oriented sections, all we need is to look clean
enough, I don't think we need to look hypeful (if I may use such a word ;-).
> * I tested it with Mozilla, Opera and Lynx on Linux; Netscape 4.something
> and IE 6.0 on WinME;
It works well in Konqueror 2.1 as well, except for the about page that seems
to have a problem with CSS positioning (if you can't trace the problem down,
contact me in personal mail and I'll try to see if it does indeed come from
your code).
> It worked very well on everything exept Netscape (because Netscpae 4's CSS
> handling is absolutly horrible!), but it was still usable on Netscape 4
> (and looked OK with CSS turned off).
Netscape 4 isn't a web browser. This isn't a commercial site, and imho as
long as it degrades well to N4 (ie is usable) then I think we can ignore
cosmetic problems that may occur there. I don't think anyone even remotely
knowledgeable about the web still uses that thing. Everyone knows it's the
only piece of software ever concieved that makes Windows 95 look bug free in
comparison.
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paranoids are people, too; they have their own problems. It's easy
to criticize, but if everybody hated you, you'd be paranoid too.
