Hello, darren, Friday, December 14, 2001, 9:39:46 PM, you wrote: dc> Alexei Danchenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 12/14/2001: >> Hello, All! >> I wonder why my '$cookie->expires' for this code returns a >> different result than the similar one with CGI::Cookie >> (commented). The result is different in a way that some >> additional binary code is being added to the expiry date. >> >> $cookie = Apache::Cookie->new( $r, >> -name=>"access", >> -value=>$value, >> -expires=>"+10m" ); >> >> # my $cookie = new CGI::Cookie( >> -name=>"access", >> -value=>$value, >> -expires=>"+10m" ); >> >> $expiry = $cookie->expires; >> >> Any suggestions? dc> Maybe I'm just slow, but I can see the difference between the dc> two. Can you elaborate? dc> (darren)
The only apparent difference that I see is that Apache::Cookie->new requires $r to be sent to it as a first parameter, where CGI::Cookie does not. Per the Apache::Cookie manpage, that should lead to the same result, but does not in my case. The cookie does not disappear. The expiry property however, gets changed and then the $cookie->bake (or $r->err_headers_out->add( "Set-Cookie" => $cookie->as_string )), which should add 'Set-cookie' to the header does not work. Here is an example of what Apache::Cookie->new returns: cÑ% @cÑ%„@cÑ%€@c‹D$…áu9DTc~.Ñ DTc‹ X@cƒÛ‹ ‰ HTcu?h€, 17-cƒÛ‹ ‰ HTcu?h€-2001 14:35:10 GMT new CGI::Cookie rather returns proper: Mon, 17-Dec-2001 14:35:54 GMT May be it worth noting that I am using Win32 (WindowsME) as a devel machine and Red Hat 6.2 as a server, where it does not work either with the same mistake. I am still bugged - can't find what's wrong. Alexei mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
