On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Maunder wrote: > The difference is that AppCluster allows you to call > multiple remote methods on the server (or on multiple > distributed servers) simultaneously. However, I wasn't > aware of PlRPC and I really like the interface i.e. the > way it creates a copy of the remote object locally and > allows you to call methods on it as if it were just > another object.
would it require too much surgery and api change if you added the concurrency support to PlRPC?
