I like Monkey Butter v1.0...... On a serious note, I work in a predominately MS shop - of 25 developers me and one other are the only Perl developers with 3 more doing some combination of Java,C++, and C.
I would suggest that anyone looking to make a case for 'Perl in the Enterprise' should look at the P5EE project ( http://p5ee.perl.org). >From that site - "The mission of the P5EE initiative is to promote the development, deployment, and acceptance of Enterprise Systems written in Perl." It has been my experience that results count, unless you are dealing with pointy-headed bosses. If that is the case, you application should spit gold bricks out of the floppy drive and it wouldn't matter. If you're looking for a name to justify Perl in Enterprise then I think the P5EE project and name is as good as any. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: ___cliff rayman___ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: New mod_perl name was [Re: New mod_perl Logo] > > > how about Everest? Niagara? Multiphase? Slipstream? > DigiServer? Pointillion? Web Mammoth? SharpWeb? > Web Enterprise? EnterWeb? > > Ged Haywood wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Chris Thompson wrote: > > > > > "mod_perl" is a lousy name. > > [snip] > > > mod_perl needs a name. Something marketable, something catchy. > > > > How about "BigFoot"? > > > > 73, > > Ged. > > -- > ___cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.genwax.com/ > > >
