Tim Noll wrote:
> Is there a proper way to call a method handler using either push_handlers or
> set_handlers? They both appear to call all handler refs just like normal
> subs, with no class name passed in. It appears that enclosing the handler in
> an anonymous sub is a workaround, but I was wondering if there was a better
> solution.
>
> # does not call handler as a method
> $r->push_handlers( PerlHandler => \&Apache::Test::handler );
>
> # does call handler as a method
> $r->push_handlers( PerlHandler => sub { Apache::Test->handler } );
>
> -Tim
>
See
http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#Perl_Method_Handlers, the eagle
and cookbook books.
PERL_METHOD_HANDLERS=1 + $$ prototype for Apache::Test::handler
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
