I didn't know about that script :) I'm glad to know it's out there. Using
the ports *would* make life much easier.
Thanks!
-- Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Silver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ryan Parr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: libperl.so vs mod_perl.so
> Ryan -
>
> I upgraded to perl 5.6 and when I built mod_perl it used the right one, I
> would guess that it would only build it against 5.0 if you didn't run the
> `use.perl {port,system}` script that comes with perl 5.6.
>
> The last time I read about loadable modules vs compiled said that the
> loadable route costs during startup, but beyond that it's nearly a
> push. Using the ports system makes upgrading Apache and all the other
> system software much easier than the other route. But, everyone does
> things differently, so YMMV!
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Doug Silver
> Network Manager
> Urchin Corporation http://www.urchin.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Ryan Parr wrote:
>
> > As a fellow FreeBSD user (4.5) I recommend building Apache and mod_perl
from
> > source. The ports version builds against the default Perl version
(5.005),
> > even if you upgrade. Therefore, that's all you get in your mod_perl.
Also,
> > it's a good idea to compile mod_perl into Apache, at least, that's what
> > everyone on this list seems to say... To get the same layout as with the
> > port install configure apache
> > --with-layout=FreeBSD
> >
> > -- Ryan
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ged Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "mod_perl Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:24 PM
> > Subject: Re: libperl.so vs mod_perl.so
> >
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >
> > > There's really no need for all this... :)
> > >
> > > > but there is no entry for LoadModule /libexec/apache/mod_perl.so
> > >
> > > That's because mod_perl.so doesn't exist.
> > >
> > > > There is a an entry for libperl.so and there is a file called
> > > > libperl.so.
> > >
> > > That's the one!
> > >
> > > > How can I quickly and easily test if mod_perl is inded installed
> > >
> > > Read the Guide some more...
> > >
> > > http://perl.apache.org/guide
> > >
> > > ... and check the error_log.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Ged.
> > >
> >
>
>
