* Stas Bekman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [28 Aug 2002 12:54]: > Nick Tonkin wrote:
[...] > > I'm in favor of your approach. I have it like that in my stuff. > > Auth::Auth, Auth::Authz, and Auth:: Access. > But Authentication, Authorization and Access aren't all Auth. May be > using Apache::AAA:: as in httpd-2.0/modules/aaa/ ? I'd have to favour them being in a second-level namespace rather than a top-level one. If they provide Apache related handlers, the Apache handler modules should be in Apache:: (or ModPerl::, Apache2:: whatever; I'm going to have to look up the new naming convention there). Generic authentication stuff should probably belong in the namespace of the appropriate protocol. (e.g. Net::LDAP::Authenticate, used by Apache::AAA::NetLDAP). But Apache specific stuff should be in an Apache related namespace. (of course, now you'll all say that the 'toplevel' thing mentioned previously was relative to Apache::. Hrm.) cheers, -- Iain.
