> > Option 3 seems okay, excect for the fact that I am that kind of Linux > > user that is always upgrading everything to the latest version possible. > > This applies to linux kernel, apache, etc. I don't really have a reason > > to do this, but I have always done it anyway. > > You're nuts. I'd fire you. :)
In other words, are you saying that you'll hire me? I plan on moving to England within the next 2 or 3 years. I'll send you an e-mail then and ask for a job. Probrably by then there'll be mod_perl3 and apache 4! Anyway, I promise I won't rush on upgrading things frenetically. ;-) > Just out of interest, which kernel are you using? This is a production server, so I am using stable 2.4.20. Wouldn't be responsible of me running 2.5.x in there right? > Well *real* Linux users only code in C and assembler - that'll give you the speed... You're right! But for simple and/or fast development scripts, I think perl with mod_perl make an excellent pair. But if you want ultra-light and really fast cgi programs, I agree that it really needs to be done in C. > By and large, 1.x is what the business world is using, and 2.x is > not-quite-bleeding-edge. Before Stas jumps on me again, there's not a > lot wrong with it, but I won't be using it for anything that involves > money until things have settled down quite a lot. I didn't know this. > Have you asked your employer what he thinks about it? He would say "WHAT????" (in portuguese though) Regards from Brazil, Henrique.
