On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 04:05, gerard uolaquetalestem wrote: > But it seems to be that with modperl as DSO this directive does not work, > and that Apache::include is only a modperl1.x funcionality, so discarted in > mod perl 2.
I don't think this has anything to do with DSO vs. static. Apache::Include and Apache::SSI are the two ways of doing includes of mod_perl scripts in mod_perl 1.x and they have not been ported to mod_perl 2 yet. If you are using apache 2, you should look at using the apache 2 version of mod_include, which can be used as a filter. Take a look at the documentation here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html > So this is my question. Are perlhandlers better than CGI registry scripts in > speed but not in funcionality??? Perl handlers have better speed and functionality than CGI scripts running under Registry, but that has nothing to do with SSI. - Perrin
