Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 22 January 2004 at 14:02:45 -0500
>
> >>the etag and last-modified headers setting has nothing to do with mod_perl
> >>in this case - it's done by default_handler, so if you fallback to
> >>default_handler then you get to deal with its logic and results.
> >
> >
> > That can't be what's happening; *without* my module, the request is
> > served with *no* last-modified header and *no* etag header -- because
> > it's a document parsed for SSI, and the default handler therefore
> > doesn't provide those things.
>
> well, that's two different things. if you accept the content phase and
> return DECLINED, you get the default-handler. if you don't accept the
> request, then you're getting server-parsed (or whatever else you set it to).
>
> so your module is making a difference, but it's not mod_perl's fault - you'd
> get the same result if you DECLINED from a C content handler.
Oh, I see what you're saying. What's happening is that if I decline,
it's getting *default*, rather than "what was previously configured".
Is that what you're saying? Any way to push another content handler
on the stack, rather than replacing what's there? (Yeah, I can
replace what's there with a list, I know how to do that.)
[snip]
> >>try
> >>
> >>$r->notes('no-etag' => 1);
> >
> >
> > This makes no difference,
>
> it should, or else something is greatly amuck with your situation - I've
> used it myself with success.
>
>
> API_EXPORT_NONSTD(int) ap_send_header_field(request_rec *r,
> const char *fieldname,
> const char *fieldval)
> {
> if (strcasecmp(fieldname, "ETag") == 0) {
> if (ap_table_get(r->notes, "no-etag") != NULL) {
> return 1;
> }
> }
> return (0 < ap_rvputs(r, fieldname, ": ", fieldval, CRLF, NULL));
> }
>
> even though this code checks for non-NULL and '1' ought to work fine, try
>
> $r->notes('no-etag' => 'omit');
I seem to remember documentation explicitly limiting "notes" to being
*strings*, so this might be worth trying (although the notes method
really ought to force a string interpretation on the 1, in that
case). I'll give this a try. The code certainly does look like it
checks for that.
> > and I can't find any documentation anywhere
> > referring to it; google
>
> use the source, luke.
After buying a whole book on the topic, in addition to what's online?
Sheesh. I guess if it's the only way, I'll have to.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
