That's fine... I can definitely live with it. The docs should be updated, though... they say Apache::Table.
-----Original Message----- From: Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:36 PM To: Kreimendahl, Chad J Cc: Stas Bekman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pnotes in apache2 Kreimendahl, Chad J wrote: > ok, but what I'm saying is... pnotes does NOT return an APR::Table > object... it's still working as it did back in mp1. The docs say what > you're saying, but it does not function that way. pnotes() will not return an APR::Table object for the same reason it does not return an Apache::Table object in mp1 - apache tables are for simple strings only, while pnotes() allows you to store perl scalars. if you want an APR::Table object then you need to use notes() instead of pnotes(), but then you are limited to strings and can't store things like perl objects. HTH --Geoff -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
