> Joe Schaefer wrote on 29 Jun 2004 15:00:54 -0400 > > Nicholas Studt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > When I read this value from a POST or a GET everything works > > happily. When I try to add something to the table the add happens > > without event, but I can not read the set value back. > > Actually a segfault is likely here, because Apache::Request::Table > does not provide a (safe) overload for APR::Table::add(). You cannot > currently assign params to any of the APR::Table-derived objects in > apreq2, but this isue should be addressed before the next release.
Having tried Geoffrey's suggestion before this mail arrived I can attest to the fact that this does indeed cause segmentation faults for the get/set interface and generally bizarre behavior for the tie interface. > > Am I missing something in how APR::Table works or is there a better > > construct I should be using? > > I haven't tested this, but it should be safe to forcibly re-bless > C<scalar $req->param> into an APR::Table object and do what you want > (without breaking anything). Do not try this with $req->args or > $req->body though. This does work to enable the get/set interface. -- nicholas studt - 29 June 2004 -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
