if PerlLoadModule supplants the command table, i surmise it does the job of PerlModule as well (which i understand to be roughly the equivalent of 'use'). i'm wondering, would there ever be a reason to load a module without wanting to supplant the command table with any existing values that may be present? would it make sense at all to effectively disambiguate the two directives by making them both synonyms for PerlLoadModule?
cheers .dorian -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
