> > > It is setup like this:-
> > >
> > > <Location /mypackage >
> > > SetHandler perl-script
> > > PerlHandler My::Package
> > > </Location>
> > Shouldn't that be
> > PerlHandler My::Package->handler
>
> Technically that isn't necessary if your method is
> called handler() and
> you have prototyped it with ($$).
>
I've got a kinda technical details point here, which
is maybe part of this issue.
I was always under the impression that in order to use
a module you should declare it with
PerlModule My::Module
<Location />
set-handler PerlScript
PerlHandler My::Module #in whatever permutation
</Location>
My question is, If you don't have a PerlModule
statement or a use My::Module, or a require or a
+My::Module statement so it looks like this
#PerlModule My:Module
<Location />
set-handler PerlScript
PerlHandler My::Module
</Location>
But the module My::Module is on the Include path for
apache (hmm or is that the apache user), What exactly
happens? or should happen?
I ask because this is how the system I'm using has
been configured. Everything seems to work, but I'm
wondering if the previous posted issue is a
consequence of doing this on two different OS systems,
one is Redhat, the other is freeBSD
I've never come across this method before.
Regards
Marty
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger -
all new features - even more fun! http://www.allnewmessenger.com
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
