> >I'm tracing through the Apache code to see what's actually happening. > > Ouch. > > Notice that apr-1.0 can be released any moment now. So please post a > notice to the apr-dev list if you find what the problem is.
Okay -- I'll do that. > >Great. I'll look at the patch. There are no relevant diffs between > >0.49 and 0.50 in the apr/network_io/unix/sockopt.c so the damage must > >have occurred somewhere else. > > Please double check that (may be the httpd-dev archives), I could be > wrong. That patch only affects the HTTP protocol handler (http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.49/CAN-2004-0493.patch) so I don't think it could be responsible for this behaviour. Also, I retested with 0.49 and the same problem is happening so.. who knows. > Yup, I'll be on the move starting tomorrow, so I'm not sure when I'll be > able to work on that. Ideally that should happen after 2.0 release, so we > don't get new TODO things on the way and first glean out the existing > ones. But feel free to work on those and we will help with any questions > that you may have (but better post them to the dev list, as they are more > technical than this list should care about). Okay -- sorry I didn't know there was a dev list. I'll subscribe to it. TTUL Ken -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
