On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:38:15AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do this on OpenBSD too, Ken, for verification)
sorry for the dealy -- was away from my PC for a day
k714% ./nonblock found port: 52984 O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across accept() on NetBSD, which contradicts the behaviour you are seeing.
Guys, could you please resolve this issue. It felt between the chairs and the new mod_perl release's test suite will still have this problem. The bug is in libapr and the sooner you resolve it the better. Could someone on the *BSD platform lead this effort and coordinate the resolution? Thanks.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
