Torsten Förtsch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 October 2004 19:10, Stas Bekman wrote:
I thought about it this night and realized that I need not to traverse
these lists at all. At first ist was a try to guess what to call
ap_input_filter_remove or ap_output_filter_remove. But if the filter is
not in an appropriate chain these functions do simply nothing. Hence I
can call them both if I don't know what kind of filter it is.
I wish we could somehow know what kind of filter is in question. In which
case we won't have needed to run wasteful CPU cycles. BTW, I've reversed
the order of removal, since I believe we will have many more output
filters than input ones. What do you think?
Yes, I agree that there will be much more output filters but since we cannot
not determine if ap_remove_output_filter has actually removed the filter we
have to call ap_remove_input_filter in any case. Hence the calling order is
all the same.
Hmm, haven't thought of that :)
Thanks again
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
