colin_e wrote:
Cheers Martin. As I said, i'm new to this game. I would only ever intend to put
config-related code in the conf files, tbut i'm still trying to work out the best way
to do things.


In my case I have multiple production/development machines on different
architectures. I want to keep the configs as far as possible in sync, but some
pieces have to be different (e.g. mod_perl needs a .dll loaded on Windows that
is not required on Solaris). The docs describe exactly this use of <Perl> for
conditional configuration.


As it stands i've gone for a rather cruder approach, with the architecture-dependent
elements in the "main line" httpd.conf, and the common bits being pulled in with
Include. The logic for this decision was that the conf file would still be usable even
if the machine's perl configuration got screwed up. I have no idea if this is the right
decision at this point, but I'm sure i'll find out by experience :-}

Could you explain how making:

PerlRequire /path/to/startup.pl

makes it harder to keep things in sync? I'm not sure i understand your example of Windows dll.

--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html



Reply via email to