> How is that related?
i think that's some cargo culting that i didn't clean up. that can
be disregarded.
> So you think this approach will be faster than flattening bb on each
> filter invocation and concatenating the scalar?
honestly i didn't give it any thought. when i wrote this i just
wanted to make it go.
> sub Apache::SubRequest::run_trapped {
> my ($r, $sref) = @_;
> [...]
> $bb->flatten(my $data);
> $$sref = $data;
> $rv;
>
> why not make the API that does run_trapped($data) and save the copying of
> what could be a huge data with:
>
> sub Apache::SubRequest::run_trapped {
> my $r = shift;
> [...]
> $bb->flatten($_[1]);
yeah that makes significantly more sense. i'll update that soon.
.d
