> this is fixed in svn
hm weird i thought i updated before i checked again.
> why? I think that at best I was mis-using the call to reset() - it always
> accepted $self as an argument, but since it wasn't actually being used I
> ignored it, mostly because I didn't want to mess around with getting the
> $Test object. then I saw that new() was actually a singleton and smacked
> myself on the head :)
i just figured if you did, other people must have as well, and
throwing in a Carp::croak('...') unless ref $self into Test::Builder::reset
might save some head-scratching all around, but, meh. ;)
.d
