-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [...]
No. Your performance will be increased using a so called proxy-setup: - - Make your frontend server as light weight as possible (don't load php and mod-perl) - - Use mod-rewrite to forward requests to dynamic pages to your mod-perl enabled server in the back running on port 81 or even you want to on another IP-adress - From the client-side it looks like you are only running one apache. There's enough information in the docs and mail-archives else get one of the great mod-perl books. Tom >> > Thanks so much for everyones help. I think I will run the apache 2.0.40 > for all of the main site and everything. Would it be a performance issue > to run both at the same time? Also, I will need to share variables (or > at least a cookie or something for authorized users) between the two > servers/scripts. Is this possible? I will need to auth a user from one > server (using PHP/Mambo)... and only allow those authed users to use > this second server. I am very open to suggestions. I have both Perl > 5.8.0 and 5.8.7 installed. Both seems to still be working fine. The main > system (when just using perl from the $PATH) is now using 5.8.7. Perl > 5.8.0 seems to still be working and installed. I wouldn't need mod_php > on the second server... at least night right away... so that is not an > issue. Is it best to install into /opt? I didn't do this for Perl.. nor > the new apache, however I removed all apache2 files I could find with > 'locate'. I prefer to use RPMs... however the main httpd server is an > RPM... 2.0.40. Also, I can have many IPs... so I would maybe not run on > port 81... just run it on 80 on a different IP. Thanks in advance. > -Jon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDCYMOkVPeOFLgZFIRAr2/AJ9vWOQ6rVpTWx+zn26wvneuhisw0QCbBOrH Mc2ticC7b747TmVLWGym1zU= =M22Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
