On Feb 17, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Yes, and you also forgot to say about the speed of this templating
system
which is very low comparing with other templating systems.
Teddy
Petal is slow because of the way is implemented. Template::Tal i s a
bit faster, but doesn't cache. The bulk of the slowness in each is
from turning the XML template into perl code If you compile
templates on startup, that becomes a non factor.
In a production environment, I found this:
HTML::Template::JIT was the fastest. it averaged something like .
0003 seconds
Template::Toolkit was around .003
Petal was around .008 (without pre-caching)
my application logic was about .08
so i began to stop caring about the relative speeds of templating
systems. theres barely any speed to be gained in them. the rest of
your code has the potential for far greater speedups
