Fred Moyer wrote: > Peter Valdemar Mørch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Dmitry Karasik dmitry-at-karasik.eu.org wrote: >>> mod_perl during the initialization process closes file descriptor 0, >>> and frees it for further reuse in other processes. Therefore, any cgi >>> script >>> executing after mod_perl is initialized, and in the same process tree, >>> will >>> have file descriptor 0 closed. The concrete example where this >>> behavior leads >>> to impossibility of processing POST requests is reported earlier and >>> is located >>> at >>> >>> http://marc.info/?l=apache-modperl&m=119062450730646&w=2 >> Dmitry's patch from Sep 25, 2007 >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/modperl/94912 has still >> not been applied to SVN. May I humbly ask that this patch is applied? > > I remember that Toersten and I put together a unit test for this but I > don't think there was any change in behavior with this patch, so I'm not > sure if anyone was able to demonstrate that it changed the behavior.
It certainly breaks t/modperl/io_nested_with_closed_stds [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Filehandle STDOUT reopened as STDIN only for input at t/response/TestModperl/io_nested_with_closed_stds.pm line 49.\n > If you have the tuits and could track down that unit test, show that it > exercises the problem in question, we probably wouldn't need much else > to apply this patch. I'd try to do this but am overextended on my tuits > right now. Yup, without a test case that correctly demonstrates the bug, and a patch that doesn't break existing tests, not very likely to get applied. -- Philippe M. Chiasson GPG: F9BFE0C2480E7680 1AE53631CB32A107 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
