Thanks Perrin. I will take a look at FastCGI. Its just that mod_perl provides all the http infrastructure so neatly, its very tempting to consider emulating Apache and reuse mod_perl. But I see your point.
regards, Deven Perrin Harkins-3 wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:00 PM, dbadhani<dbadh...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> This may sound far fetched, but has anyone tried porting mod_perl for web >> servers other than Apache. > > No, and it wouldn't really work. A generic approach to running > persistent code already exists in the form of FastCGI. The rest of > mod_perl is a perl interface to the Apache API, which makes it > unsuitable for other web servers. > >> Basically, I am looking for integrating some of mod_perl functionality in >> some high performance middleware, basically to provide a way to >> customized, >> "scriptable" request processing in the request processing engine. > > You could look at FastCGI, or embedding perl directly. > > - Perrin > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/portability-of-mod_perl-for-other-web-servers-apps-tp25140259p25155493.html Sent from the mod_perl - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
