Both very good points! I stand corrected.
Michael Peters wrote:
On 03/18/2010 06:05 PM, Michael A. Capone wrote:
This would be the most secure way.
Saying it's the *most* secure way is a little stretch. It's *another*
secure way. Also, keeping a large Perl/CGI process alive just to serve
a static file is a waste. In fact, if you can think of a mod_rewrite
rule to automatically look for the cached file first and send that
before even getting to the CGI script would be your best bet for
performance.
